Scott Martin

ContactScott Martin has been covering the financial markets since 1996 and the securities business since 2001. He was a long-time columnist for Research, market writer at CNNfn.com, and editor of Buyside; his work currently appears in publications like The Trust Advisor, Institutional Investor, and EmergingMoney.com.
read more ...

FINRA Goes After "No Class Action" Waivers, Starting With Schwab edit
Thursday, February 02, 2012 14:06

Tags: Schwab

Brokerage account paperwork has become notorious for asking clients to sign away their legal rights if anything goes wrong. Schwab seems to have taken that policy one step too far for the regulators.

If you're a private wealth advisor, please join Advisors4Advisors (A4A) to get its full benefits.

Register now, and we will donate $20 of our $60 membership fee to Bubbles The Clown’s financial literacy program, and you can post an icon on your website saying you support Bubbles' 501(c)3 charitable organization.

Plus, get other membership benefits, including:

  • Analysis daily of issues affecting advisors
  • Aggregation of news from dozens of sites targeting wealth managers
  • Reviews by advisors of practice management applications
  • 30 independent experts blogging on advisor business issues
  • 24/7 access to webinars with 50 hours of CFP® CE and 100 hours of IMCA CE
Register Now
   

 

In October, Schwab rolled out new customer agreements that unilaterally eliminated the prospect of class action lawsuits or any consolidated arbitration.

 

FINRA argues that the new terms go over the line and that every new account Schwab opens makes the situation worse.

 

Schwab claims that it's within its rights under recent interpretations of the Federal Arbitration Act.

 

Setting this case up in terms of federal law versus FINRA rules opens the way for a test of FINRA's authority.

 

We know that the courts consider FINRA supreme and unquestionable in all regulatory matters, even the most tangentially connected to its work.

 

In a case where the courts themselves seem to contradict the regulator, which will come out on top?

 

In any event, this is one of those cases where FINRA is clearly protecting the retail investor. If the regulator wins, Schwab's clients get to keep their power to defend themselves. If Schwab wins, the regulator loses -- but so do the customers.

 

 

Comments (0)

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 

Login

Banner
Banner
Banner

Comments

Banner

Reviews

Banner